Topic started by M.Anand (@ ihproxy1.proxy.lucent.com) on Tue Jan 18 01:03:04 EST 2000.
All times in EST +10:30 for IST.
hi all, I am Anand from bangalore and a new visitor to the tfm page. I am a great fan of both ARR and IR. I browsed through all the earlier threads on ARR and IR. It seems to me that there are quite a few anti ARRs out here.
Let me tell you something about IRs music. IRs music became popular and sounded different because he tried to bring in a westernization of Carnatic ragas in his songs. Even a dappanguthu was in Lathaangi or sivaranjani. That actually made the difference. Otherwise he is no great MD. One might argue that such a westernization or incorporation of a carnatic raga in a dappanguthu or jazz is something that demands great applause. But IR doesn't deserve that because, if u say u are tuning a song in a particular raagam, you have to bring out the nuances, the laya and bhaava of the raagam in to the song. Just traversing the swaras in the raagam here and there does not mean that u have tuned a song in that raagam. Ilayaraaja has done just that, a mere traversal through the swaras. In many places, there were apaswaras also. ARR has tuned very few songs based on Carnatic ragas but they were classics. For example Mettu podu in Anjali is a beautiful song in Ananda Bhairavi. He has brought out every nuance of the raagam in that song. Minsaara Kanna in padaiyappa is an excellent piece in vasantha. En mel vizhunda mazhai tuliye is again a beautiful piece in kaapi. A real mix of the east and west. That is what u call fusion. Ilayaraaja boasts of having composed songs in rare raagas like chala nattai, kanakangi etc. For example pani vizhum malar vanam in chala nattai is again a pure note traversal. There was no attempt to bring out the nuances in the raaga. So IR knew how to make songs sound good but ARR gives a fine polish to each and every one of his songs. IR composed music for 700 odd films. Hey Ram is his 785th film. Considering 7 songs per movie, he has tuned almost 5500 songs. Huge number indeed but hardly 5% of those songs are listenable others are 100% pure junk. But 99.9% of ARRs songs are listenable and they are also good numbers. What do you say about this?
Regards,
Anand
Responses:
- Old responses
- From: kiru (@ surf0004.sybase.com)
on: Mon Apr 10 21:39:29 EDT 2000
Just to put things in perspective, Srikanth, you may want to mention that whatever you state above is for POP recordings. Classical recordings eschew all these things. For eg, Kavi Alexanders' recordings are made with just two (Blumlein) microphones and have no digital effects. He made the news recently for recording the whole Philadelphia Orchestra itself with his usual blumlein arrangement.
- From: srikanth (@ wdslppp129.sttl.uswest.net)
on: Mon Apr 10 21:52:13 EDT 2000
tfm is something like pop music,
the above also applies to bgm tracks in english films, sound engineer is the key, he plays a big role, he can change the pallavi to saranam or vise versa. In India this trend is yet to come.
Kiru,
Recording live wc scores is an art by itself, during my music school days i have studied many chamber scores are record in old churchs to get the natural reverb etc likewise our carantic music is recorded with just 3 mics.
- From: kiru (@ surf0004.sybase.com)
on: Mon Apr 10 22:37:01 EDT 2000
Srikanth,
I agree most TFM music is POP.
But many of IR's songs have a classical arrangement. I dont know how all these new techniques can fit in. I have a CD 'Hits of Yesudas' by IR. I am very happy with the recording. I would never want any digital effects in them. But many recent songs of his really need this kind of sound engineering but lack it.
Yes, churches are the most sought after place for recording, especially chamber music. Many churches have been converted to recording studios. You can do other kinds of recordings too. Its the 'space' people are after more than the reverb, which can also be very pleasing.
You can hear the electronic drone I am talking about in 'yArO yArOdi' in alaipayuthe. I have noticed many ARRs techniques that can be classified as 'innovative use of sound' - 1) sounds of LP noise in 'iruvar' to give the 'period' effect. 2) using crash cymbals for rain effect (chAral) in then mErku paruvakkAttru.
I dont think ARR uses just the sampled sounds.He kind of adds some effects to them. For eg. the using LFO with tabla (as mentioned by Shashi). All this along with his mixing he creates a signature sound that no MD in India has been able to replicate. Only album that comes close is 'poovellAm kEttuppAr' by Yuvan Shankar RAja.
- From: srikanth (@ wdslppp129.sttl.uswest.net)
on: Mon Apr 10 23:00:04 EDT 2000
kiru,
"Proper (rather unquie) tonality selection came into picture more prominantly when arr came into the scene, -- my earlier posting"
ARR uses just the sampled sounds
--- i told the same thing. :))
also kiru, you are in misnorm that digital means efx, efx is part of digital tech,
i am talking about sound clarity, sound is any day more clear in if recording using a digital recordor,
like instruments like Korg trinity or many micorphones have an digital output these days, this can be connected to a digital mixer or directly connected digitally to a workstation like roland vs series, there is not sound loss.,
without efx it self you will hear lot of difference.
- From: rjay (@ brkfw0005.navistar.com)
on: Tue Apr 11 12:21:10 EDT 2000
arul,
Thanks for the pointers to the music. I will
listen to it tonight. And thanks for the pointer
to the book. It is very nice to read expert views
from Srikanth, Kiru and you.
more later
rjay
- From: rjay (@ brkfw0005.navistar.com)
on: Tue Apr 11 12:22:17 EDT 2000
arul,
Thanks for the pointers to the music. I will
listen to it tonight. And thanks for the pointer
to the book. It is very nice to read expert views
from Srikanth, Kiru and you.
more later
rjay
- From: rjay (@ brkfw0005.navistar.com)
on: Tue Apr 11 12:23:44 EDT 2000
MS, Chandy, Vijay,
Thanks for taking time to read and
for the nice words,
rjay
- From: rjay (@ brkfw0005.navistar.com)
on: Tue Apr 11 13:13:28 EDT 2000
Your discussions made me think about
mixing during various periods.
In a classical symphonic setting,
where a live orchestra plays, the only
way to vary the texture dramatically is to
bring in different instruments at different
point of time. The only way to balance
volumes and to mix relative volums would be
to have multiple instruments and have them
play together or alone! Otherwise we dont need
5 horns, 4 violins and so on. And the only way
to fill the spectrum would be to have a violin,
viola, cello and contrabass, which are
all violins of different size and hence
frequency range. Similarly brass and woodwinds.
A novice composer would write something and
it would sound terrible mix (I am not talking
about the quality of music, but the quality of
the sound), because he used two instrument which
occupy the same spectrum simultaneouslya and
they would muffle each other. Or he would choose
a pitch range for an instrument, without knowing
that it sounds horrible in that range. For example, asking a piccolo to play low notes.
This is why the term composer and arranger
become important, because while writing good
catchy and effective musical ideas itself
is great skill, putting them together in a
rich orchestra is a much more difficult art.
However, when a composer like Beethoven or anyone in
his class writes for the instruments many many
years and listens, he learns which instruments
go together well and to Srikanth's point,
how instruments spread out and how they fill
the spectrum, without hindering each other or
muffling the mix altogether. At this point,
the composer does not even need to play and see,
he can use his past experience and thumb rules
(which might get translated into intuition -
or the subconscious habit, to be less mystical)
I think Ilayaraja has developed such an ear for orchestral sounds, so attracted by western
classical music.
If the score is well written and arrangers and
performers understand the composers intentions
and score's functions completely, then in a
big cathedral you can get the orchestra to play
it and just capture the entire thing without
any eletronic readjustments. It might still sound
excellent. Kavi Alexander (I have not heard
him or heard of him) might be a 'back-to-nature' attempt. After
all, if the listener can sit in the cathedral and
get ecstasy listening to the live orchestra
two hi quality mics can be placed where his ears are, should capture the sounds
as good as that!
However, the potential offered by digital
recording and mixing is amazing. Think of it
this way:
When MSV composed, he sings out or calls out
the musical ideas to each and every musician,
then gets them to play together in small groups
first and then later in larger groups. How
would he mix well? Just by telling the musicians
to play little more loudly or softly and they
would remember these settings. And without multiple rehearsals and keeping the same
musicians over and over, mixing would be a
horribly difficult job. Think of that and
'Engae nimmadhi' seems an amazing achievement!
In the time of Raja, he effectively used the
technology - of writing down score parts and
getting people to arrange. The moment you write
down, a lot is lost. First melody is broken into
discrete notes. But I think he used the score only
to give a rough idea and get the performers
to learn the basic idea. And then he would have
auditioned each musician (at least the
lead melodies and distinct areas like bass etc)
and corrected him like wise by correcting the
performance and giving cues in volume dynamics,
pitch dynamics, and countless instrument specific
nuances. (I remember Arunmozhi saying,
"Other music directors would give just the
note sequence for a flute solo, but Raja would
also tell me how the vary the volume levels while playing" - this is well understood factor in
the west). Then an 8-track recording and a
console mixing would have definitely helped.
Digital recording provides a wider palette
ranging from instrument sounds, to their
dynamics to mixing. Rahman today has
at his disposal a wide variety of techniques,
including all the ones available to his
musical ancestors.
Indian classical music took a radically differnt
view. Why need multiple instruments to play
simultaneouly? Instead have the singer
go deeper into his ideas and bring out the
emotion. At any point, let one instrument
play its soul out. If mridhangam player has
mastered his instrument, we will give him
a separate section for improvisation. If there
is an additional ghatam vidwan, let them play
a duel during the avardhanam. The whole
emphasis is on the feel of the melody and
the complex elaborations of the rhythms.
Many composers use this minimalist viewpoint.
We have seen T.Rajendar produce great hits
by focusing on the melody and the lyrical impact.
We have seen MSV, Raja, Rahman produce
outstanding melodic hits which almost
seem unembellished, and still soul-stirrers -
like Kannae kalaimaane, porale ponnuththayee.
- From: rjay (@ brkfw0005.navistar.com)
on: Tue Apr 11 13:21:34 EDT 2000
A good analogy would be to see music as
painting.
There are realistic painting, modern art,
cartoons, water color, oil painting, pen and
ink, pencil forms and photography is a form of
painting.
Similarly we can see, orchestral music,
melody-oriented-music, synth, ambience etc
I many times think the problem of composition
is the same problem faced by a painter or
for that matter a story teller - how to
put different things and people and ideas
together and make it feel like a seemless
whole that moves smoothly from one point to
another and yet create dramatic emotions -
during its journey.
List all pages of this thread
Post comments
Forums: Current Topics - Ilayaraja Albums - A.R. Rahman Albums - TFM Oldies - Fun & Games
Ilaiyaraja: Releases - News - Share Music - AR Rahman: Releases - News - AOTW - Tweets -
Discussions: MSV - YSR - GVP - Song Requests - Song stats - Raga of songs - Copying - Tweets
Database: Main - Singers - Music Director's - Lyricists Fun: PP - EKB - Relay - Satires - Quiz