Brahma Kumaris ?

**PARAMASHIVAN** · 3rd November 2010, 06:33 PM

Originally Posted by Sudhaama

13.MARRIAGE is an UNNECESSARY BURDEN. So prefer to be UNMARRIED.

well said ! makes perfect rational sense!

**Google Adsense** · 3rd November 2010 06:33 PM

**Sudhaama** · 3rd November 2010, 08:49 PM

Originally Posted by PARAMASHIVAN

Originally Posted by Sudhaama

13.MARRIAGE is an UNNECESSARY BURDEN. So prefer to be UNMARRIED.

well said ! makes perfect rational sense!

Dear PARAMASIVA, Please think over what the God Parama-Siva said and showed... by DEMONSTRATION too.

..especially THIRUNEELAKANTA Nayanmar... who adopted celebacy BRAHMACHARYAM, even after Marriage.!

You know that Episode's End Lesson... and GUIDANCE TO HUMANITY about the Marriage Concept and Commitment... laid down by God.!

..which sense corroborates with Scientific truth too!

.

**PARAMASHIVAN** · 3rd November 2010, 09:21 PM

I know sudhama sir, I was just joking

**Sudhaama** · 3rd November 2010, 10:04 PM

.

Deepavali Concept...

...depicted by Marriage Sense too.

I for my Society... MY Society for me.!!!

I for You... You for Me.!

Originally Posted by PARAMASHIVAN

Originally Posted by Sudhaama

13.MARRIAGE is an UNNECESSARY BURDEN. So prefer to be UNMARRIED.

well said ! makes perfect rational sense!

Dear PARAMASIVA,

I will be pained to note any of my Friend's FRUSTRATION...

...the Background sense of such a Conclusion against the BASIC WORTH and purpose of Marriage alliance itself as LIFE-PARTNER.

Irrespective of Religious stipulations by any and all Religions...

..let us consider SCIENTIFICALLY and by SOCIAL ASPECT also.

Not only you... there are many persons in the current era, who come to such a DRASTIC CONCLUSION...

...Defying the very concept of Marriage in any Humans Life.

Yes. We have learnt the Lesson on Marriage, in the context of contemporary days too.

Life of any Individual can be MADE AND IMPROVED by another Individual

But the Converse Logic cannot be applicable.

So to say... One person's Life should not be allowed to be UNMADE by any one other ONE INDIVIDUAL.

Yes. By a Single BITTER EXPERIENCE with just One Individual UNWORTHY PARTNER,

....we should not condemn the whole DEEP SENSE of HUMAN-VALUES by means of Marriage of RIGHT MATCHED Couple.

If the Nut does not suit the Bolt...

...CHANGE the Nut.!

But DON'T REJECT either the Bolt OR the ENGINE.
.

. .

**PARAMASHIVAN** · 4th November 2010, 04:25 PM

Let's stick to the topic please

**Sudhaama** · 4th November 2010, 04:41 PM

.

Originally Posted by PARAMASHIVAN

Let's stick to the topic please

Yes. I am very much on the Topic only only....

...especially replying to your contradiction, supporting the IMPRACTICABLE CONCEPT ....

...Defying the DIVINE LAW OF NATURE.... Stipulated by God, as observed in Reality too by His SILENT LANGUAGE by action.

So I have to describe and JUSTIFY BY REASONING, as to why and on what GROUNDS I have to repudiate on this Organisation's approach on the BASICS OF HUMANITY itself.

It is shocking for me to know the policy of this organisation to condemn the Divine concept of Marriage itself...

..as also insisting on separation of Husband and Wife.

Is it fair for anybody to render such an undue PUNISHMENT to any Married couple...

...in the Name of SOUL UPLIFT.????

I vehemently object on these two aspects only... mainly because I was one of the WORST SUFFERERS because my close Relative was a Member staunch follower

Consequently I had to face all his problems, including the Marriages of his Two Daughters and One Son.

So I have to convey to the WORLD SOCIETY the Truth and EVENTUAL Reality...

...caused by the OUT-DATED Principle of this Organisation on the Two aspects only I have to highlight to the People who may be interested to know the Other side.

..

**PARAMASHIVAN** · 31st May 2011, 03:39 PM

I went to their talk yesterday in London, dadi Janki was the guest of honour! Their teaching seems more emotional approach to enlightenment than rational approach!