Home   Forum   Wiki   Notes   Register   FAQ   Sitemap   About Us   Contact Us  

Is Rahman Village, Carnatic and Background Musically Challenged?

Topic started by Bhagavathar (@ 209.43.73.97) on Sun Oct 29 01:31:55 EDT 2000.
All times in EST +10:30 for IST.

A great music director should be known for his/her trick on all trades when it comes to music. But AR Rahman is good only in recording crystal clear music. As far other areas are concerned he had failed miserably. Listen to all his village oriented songs same type of digital music. Even Deva and SAR do better job than him. What about BGM he plays the songs repeatedly. Deva does a better job atleast copying from Titanic or BraveHeart. What happened to songs based out of Raagas there also he lacks knowledge. What about his singing style man. Drs recommend his "Vandemataram" to clear Constibation than bringing out patriotism.

Discuss this fake, self promoting and copying star and remove his masquerade.

---

Responses:

• Old responses
  
• From: Ganga (@ 129.253.193.7) on: Fri Nov 3 15:25:59 EST 2000
  
  I am not soliciting anything here. But just to give an idea of how democratic debates can really take place I give this example. Here I find fun, disagreement, apprciation everything expressed so nicely.
  http://www.forumhub.com/tlit/31918.10.33.31.html
  
  
• From: fan (@ 216.190.255.35) on: Fri Nov 3 15:26:52 EST 2000
  
  Udhaya:We have discussed about 100gb of data, of that about 70% has ended in a cold war, we get good info from time to time,
  
  Here in this thread, we tried to start the discussion several times, but we failed,
  instead of sailing the ship was washed to the shore, we had enough of "arr being great" or "some other md being great" ....
  
  all work no play makes "fill your name" a dull boy, so relax, we will be discussing good things very soon,it is matter of time.
  Until then take is as a vacation pal.
  
  
  btw:
  swamiji:
  what is final verdict ?
  will bush win or gore win, please predict.,
  ching chak ching chak ching ching chak
  
  
• From: lottu (@ 38.219.83.254) on: Fri Nov 3 15:31:50 EST 2000
  
  indha maathiriyaana cold-war situationukku, ARR, enna instruments use pannuvaar ? ....finally back to thread ? :))
  
  
• From: Udhaya (@ 63.89.188.194) on: Fri Nov 3 15:33:20 EST 2000
  
  Great thread, Ganga. I also don't see any allegedly-humorous deviations/disruptions there either. It's a vicious cycle that so many posts are needed to attempt to re-direct a thread's focus. Since, there's no full-time admin, I try my part in the few threads I participate. But enough has been said by me on one issue, in one thread for one day. Enjoy yourselves, I plan to. Bye.
  
  
• From: seedan (@ 216.190.255.35) on: Fri Nov 3 15:38:12 EST 2000
  
  lottu:
  arr.. will use room heater,humidifier,
  
  
• From: Swamiji (@ 198.102.112.201) on: Fri Nov 3 15:41:28 EST 2000
  
  Gore win panna nambala maadiri swamijikku konjam easy ya irukkum...
  Udhaya romba news paper padikkaru nanaikkaren, pasangalaa, avar kojam cocaine kuduthu pannunga please...
  
  
• From: MS (@ 129.252.23.185) on: Fri Nov 3 16:45:30 EST 2000
  
  Is this the same DF which once stressed on politeness in expression as one of the preliminary requisites ?
  
  bb,RR:
  
  Pardon me for my comments. But, my humble observation is that you need to be a bit more stringent, observant, authoritative and vigilant. If left unattended, it may degenerate into just one of the forums which are short of manners. Please do the needful.
  
  
• From: Ganga (@ 129.253.193.7) on: Fri Nov 3 16:51:13 EST 2000
  
  Udhaya, When the debaters are serious to the cause morons like me would keep away and watch. But where morons debate we could not find the difference and mingle. That is all.
  Guys, Could not resist leaving you guys having all the fun by yourselves. So I am back. Now what is finally decided about this thread? It is owned by us or them. We or Them Isn't that the other title for all the threads here??
  
  
• From: Swamiji (@ 198.102.112.201) on: Fri Nov 3 16:58:48 EST 2000
  
  Welcome Ganga, I missed you ;)
  
  
• From: vazhipokkan (@ 63.100.100.142) on: Fri Nov 3 17:10:40 EST 2000
  
  Indha threadin saarbaga gangavirku panamudippu madhipirkuriya swamiji vazhanguvar. karakosham karakosham:-))
  
  
• From: seedan autodeskananda (@ 216.190.255.35) on: Fri Nov 3 17:11:02 EST 2000
  
  welcome back swamiji...we missed you...
  
  swamiji..thavapudalva..manavala...ore chain phone conference potu oru half hour bajanai panna enna..
  
  
• From: Swamiji (@ 198.102.112.201) on: Fri Nov 3 17:15:52 EST 2000
  
  Oho pannalaame U know my phone number. We can conf right away...konjam periyavara thookam pannaren
  
  
• From: Manga (@ 208.154.130.13) on: Fri Nov 3 17:31:12 EST 2000
  
  Ganga
  
  Enna inga ezhudharavanga ellam romba arivu pudhalvargal maari pesareenga! Everyone has no name here except a few. But those few with names like to boast themselves as techies and are egocentric. So, since most of them who write here like you and me have no names of their own, can we call them all as morons? In that case, this forum can be named, "moron discussion forum" what say you? You seem to be trying to identify yourself with the so called heavy-headed guys in this forum. Chee chee indha forum puLikkum!
  
  
• From: Swamiji (@ 198.102.112.201) on: Fri Nov 3 17:34:08 EST 2000
  
  I have a name..it is jeyendralakshmiparvatiamutha seethamookambikeyalathathiruananda swamiji...aka Swamiji. And please dont call me moron, but make it a title if u want to :)
  
  
• From: vazhipokkan (@ 63.100.100.141) on: Fri Nov 3 18:34:52 EST 2000
  
  swamiji unga pera padikarathukullaye enakku moochu vangarathu:-) nalla short pera irukke:-))
  
  
• From: Ganga (@ 129.253.193.7) on: Fri Nov 3 18:44:28 EST 2000
  
  Manga (mangaa vaa maangaavaa ?) and swamiji,
  Considering myself a moron would be the last thing I would ever do, so why did I say moron? Because that is the only language our friend Udhaya will understand. If you have any doubt see any of his posting in this or any other thread. There is not a posting without an adjective expressed clearly, under his name. Read his reply. He was acting as the self appointed admin to bring in discipline and ethics.Please do not laugh here. He would be offended and post another series of invectives. Anyway, have a happy weekend.
  
  
• From: swamiji (@ 198.102.112.201) on: Fri Nov 3 19:02:01 EST 2000
  
  Seri kannu....everyone have a great weekend!
  
  
• From: Udhaya (@ 207.218.69.64) on: Sat Nov 4 12:26:00 EST 2000
  
  Ganga,
  You apologized and pulled back. I acknowledged and apologized too. Things could have been left there. But you have gone on attacking me when I wasn’t even around, is this your tactic to win an argument? Mighty brave of you isn’t it? I don’t like using the public forum for private quarrels. Any heated debates I engage in are issue-oriented unless otherwise warranted.
  
  I can go on living with a smirk on my face for all the perceptions you have about me, but should you choose to air them, why not directly to me in a private forum? It’s obvious that you are seething. Why don’t we sort this out offline and keep our business out of the public eye? If you want an audience, pick some neutral folks to preside over and we will take it to a chat room. If you want none of this and must have it out here, then go on and post once more and declare yourself the winner. I will not address you in this thread any longer.
  
  
• From: STS (@ 38.28.19.72) on: Sat Nov 4 13:54:19 EST 2000
  
  Kududam says MR's assistant's movie is delayed because of ARR.
  
  http://www.kumudam.com/lightsonline/mainpage.html
  Click on 'kisu kisu' section.
  
  Hope this changes the bashing going on here...
  
  
• From: MS (@ 129.252.23.185) on: Sat Nov 4 15:15:56 EST 2000
  
  STS:
  
  What has this got to do with ARR's musical abilities ? If the need be for a deliberate digression to put an end to the present stormy situation, we can discuss even kambaraamaayanam. That is just as much digressive as your suggestion. NOM.
  
  
• From: Chandraswami (@ 24.176.37.123) on: Sat Nov 4 15:43:50 EST 2000
  
  ARR is a bachcha
  IR is Kutcha
  MSV is bahut achcha
  hahahahahaha.........
  
  
• From: Bhagavathar (@ 209.43.56.201) on: Sat Nov 4 15:47:07 EST 2000
  
  We can call ARR multi faced and multi talented in copying MSV, Veda, IR, Chandrabose, Deva, SAR and other very popular Western artists!!!!!
  
  
  
• From: appusami (@ 63.22.120.79) on: Sat Nov 4 15:57:53 EST 2000
  
  dey chandrasami! unnala nadakkavae mudiyathu podang ...ya.
  
  
• From: Chandraswami (@ 24.176.37.123) on: Sat Nov 4 16:22:26 EST 2000
  
  appusami, nee seedhekezhaviya mudalla samaali. Naan pillayaraiyae paal kudikka vachavan theriyuma.
  
  
• From: STS (@ 38.28.52.202) on: Sat Nov 4 17:02:25 EST 2000
  
  MS,
  
  YEAH, We talk only about musical abilities here!
  Thanks for reminding me that ! The news is about ARR. That way I see atleast there is a relevance.
  
  
• From: STS (@ 38.28.52.202) on: Sat Nov 4 17:05:06 EST 2000
  
  MS,
  
  If you wish to discuss 'Kambaramayanam' I have no objection.
  
  
• From: mabbusami (@ 63.21.208.123) on: Sat Nov 4 17:25:57 EST 2000
  
  dey chndraswami nee pillayara milk saapida vakkalam naan avunga appanukkae lesson kuduthavan.
  
  
• From: MS (@ 129.252.23.185) on: Sat Nov 4 17:40:45 EST 2000
  
  STS:
  
  I know you will not have objections as it would then be contrary to your approach here. YOu know why I said kambaraamayanam ? After the break up with Vairamuththu, ARR had tried many new budding poets. One of them is "iLaya kamban". He thus has the name of the great poet who wrote kambaraamaayanam. Thus ARR's musical abilities --->ARR --> ilaya kamban--->kamban ----> kambaraamaayaanam. Just thought that I would justify my relevance too.
  
  We can further relate by kambaraamaayanam--->ram ---> krishna---->conceot of avathaar----->10 avathaars---> mathsya avathaaar---->theory of evolution----> charles darwin---->charles sobraj (charles is the link)----> ilayaraj(a)---> composing skills----> ARR and come back to the thread.
  
  NOM
  
  
• From: Trend (@ 216.68.113.227) on: Sat Nov 4 19:03:12 EST 2000
  
  MS,
  
  indha connection patthi innum konjam explain pannungaleen!
  
  charles sobraj (charles is the link)----> ilayaraj(a)
  
  Trend
  
  
• From: Trend (@ 216.68.113.227) on: Sat Nov 4 19:03:37 EST 2000
  
  MS,
  
  indha connection patthi innum konjam explain pannungaleen!.-)
  
  charles sobraj (charles is the link)----> ilayaraj(a)
  
  Trend
  
  

---

List all pages of this thread

Post comments