Home   Forum   Wiki   Notes   Register   FAQ   Sitemap   About Us   Contact Us  

PITHAMAGAN RELEASED

Topic started by SIVA (@ 203.195.184.205) on Thu Oct 2 05:03:36 EDT 2003.
All times in EST +10:30 for IST.

THE MOST AWAITED MAESTRO'S PITHMAGAN RELASED NY FIVE STAR AUDIOS Y'DAY.

---

Responses:

• Old responses
  
• From: Will (@ 61.1.203.224) on: Mon Dec 15 04:14:42 EST 2003
  
  And, then follows some post exchanges between Senty and Sangameshwar, which all deal primarily with LOGIC SENSE in the film. My only addendum: Of course, most movies are logically imperfect, but, the degree of imperfection (as far as logic is concerned) is very much greater than most other "good" films.
  
  
• From: Will (@ 61.1.203.224) on: Mon Dec 15 04:17:54 EST 2003
  
  Rajasaranam wrote:
  _______________________
  Will,
  konjam chinna post panni iruntha sulabama irunthu irukum.ne way i agree with ur biased viewpoint towards the movie. naan kooda konjam appadithaan, enakku 'pidikka koodathunnu mudivu kattittu' oru movie parkka arambichaena athula irukura ottai mattum thaan theriyum.
  _______________________
  
  Thanks Rajasaranam for revealing the truth about yourself. Thank you very much. But, do take a note that I am in no way like you. I never see a movie with 'any' expectations or with a pre-determined mindset. It's the movie, and the movie alone that makes me swing in either direction.
  
  Also, let me tell you that I am NOT the type of person who makes a post, and then when somebody replies to them, is unable to back his own statements, and runs away with a lame excuse. You know who I am talking about don't you?
  
  
• From: Will (@ 61.1.203.224) on: Mon Dec 15 04:19:07 EST 2003
  
  Guys,
  
  I had just managed to make these many posts in the limited time I got. I request you post replies to these, and I promise to reply to them all when I get the time (hopefully, I will).
  
  See ya all people till then.
  
  Take care!
  
  
• From: rajasaranam (@ 210.214.3.40) on: Mon Dec 15 04:39:28 EST 2003
  
  Will,
  
  *I had just managed to make these many posts in the limited time I got.
  
  +Iam happy that u got only limited time.[let the job ur at keep u busy iam afraid wat will happen if u got ample time] btw nobody here is gonna post replies to u. u know why dont u :-)
  
  
• From: Will (@ 61.1.203.195) on: Tue Dec 16 23:28:25 EST 2003
  
  Greetings all!
  
  I just saw Thirumalai and Jay Jay yesterday.
  
  My 0.2®:
  ¨¨¨¨¨¨¨¨
  Thirumalai: Nice characterisation. Would have been a great film had there been less heroism.
  
  Jay Jay: A pretty usual film. Nice concept, but the way the story had been told was not as good.
  
  Explanation:
  ¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯
  For those people who say that the characterisation in Pithamagan had been good, what do you say about the characterisation of the Thirumalai character in the film "Thirumalai". Okay, apart from the heriosm that had been unnecessarily (and, deliberately) mixed, (of course, Vijay has a huge fan base who expect to see such scenes).
  
  I think Ramana had done a good job as far as characterisation was concerned, for it was as good (though not better) as that in Pithamagan.
  
  But I wonder why still some people say that the characterisation of Sithan is great, and that of Thirumalai gets no nearer. Is it because they sort of think (or feel) better because they find seeing an unusual (or terrible) character to be one with next nature to them? Like I said before? (I am still searching for words to put it better...)
  
  It is as difficult (or more difficult) to "CREATE" a character like Thirumalai than Sithan. "Sithan = A man in more proximity to Wild beings than Human". The entire characterisation is based on this one line. But, the character of Thirumalai, on the other hand, is tougher to etch, with all those scenes depicting "the character's" values, beliefs, ideas, et cetra. The latter commands more intellectual thinking compared to the former, for sure.
  
  And, of course, I am not talking about screenplay or story or logic. (Which means they were bad, yes). My arguement is only concerned with "characterisation" that is _"talked about"_ to have been "fantastic" in Pithamagan.
  
  Moving on to JAY JAY, first thing I notice is the nice songs. Saran's concept is good, but its implementation had not been as fine. And, of course, poor logic... (remember a temple elephant getting a 100-rupee note?, and a roadside Pani Puri stall-man accepting a 500-rupee note and returning the change?). Overall, a pretty usual or mediocre kind of a film...that we had not come to expect from Saran! And, I forgot, a good entertainment film for old teens and young adults...
  
  
• From: rajasaranam (@ 210.210.32.75) on: Wed Dec 17 04:37:34 EST 2003
  
  this guy Will is frm SUNTV TOPTEN nigazhchi. thirumalai- erimalai no.1
  JayJay-vazhga no.2
  Pithamagan-verum magan intha padathirkku intha vaaram idam kidaiyathu.
  meendum adutha vaaram intha padangal ithae idathil thodaruma enbadai paarpom. nandri.
  
  
• From: Maverick (@ 192.128.133.68) on: Wed Dec 17 05:19:51 EST 2003
  
  Top 10 continues
  
  4-aam idathil Iyarkkai - Nambikkai
  5-aam idathil Enakku 20 Unakku 18 - Kanakku
  6-aam idathil Anjaneya - Balam
  7-aam idathil Winner - Vedikkai
  
  you guys continue....
  
  
  
  After Virumaandi releases if Kamal doesnt give them any rights, then it would be
  
  4-aam idathil Virumaandi - Verum aandi (though, they'd love to say Mayiraandi)
  
  
• From: rajasaranam (@ 210.210.32.75) on: Wed Dec 17 05:36:41 EST 2003
  
  Maverick,
  lol that was really hillarious.
  
  
• From: prabu (@ ) on: Mon Dec 29 03:49:48 EST 2003
  
  no comments all boring
  
  
• From: BEWARE ! (@ 61.11.77.81) on: Sat Jan 3 23:35:57 EST 2004
  
  Are you still talking about this lousy movie ?
  Vikram crocks his head like a hen and thinks it is great acting! Poor chap. Combined with the stupid music of Raja it is dump of a movie.
  
  

---

List all pages of this thread

---

Back to the Forum

Post comments